While it should hardly come as a surprise that just two days ahead of a meeting between the US and China seeking to resolve and defuse trade tensions, the two sides are, well, seeking to resolve and defuse trade tensions (and boost markets) and are "exploring a trade deal in which Washington would suspend further ...
Tyler Durden considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Barry Ritholtz writes Succinct Summations of Week’s Events 8.23.19
Kathy Lien writes Full Blown FX Risk Aversion, Trade War Reaches New Heights
Calculated Risk writes Lawler: Updated “Demographic” Outlook Using Recent Population Estimates by Age
Bureau of Economic Analysis writes Gross Domestic Product for American Samoa, 2018
While it should hardly come as a surprise that just two days ahead of a meeting between the US and China seeking to resolve and defuse trade tensions, the two sides are, well, seeking to resolve and defuse trade tensions (and boost markets) and are "exploring a trade deal in which Washington would suspend further tariffs through the spring in exchange for new talks looking at big changes in Chinese economic policy", which is what the WSJ reported moments ago and what the market is responding to, providing a modest bid to stocks following the earlier G-20 negative news that Peter Navarro is back on the Trump-Xi dinner list.
As the WSJ notes, "the talks have been conducted, via telephone, for several weeks, and are coming to a head shortly before President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping meet for dinner on Saturday at the end of the Group of 20 leaders’ summit in Buenos Aires."
New talks would focus on what both sides are calling trade “architecture,” a broad term that could encompass many issues the U.S. has wanted Beijing to address, including intellectual property protection, coerced technology transfer, subsidies to state-owned enterprises, and even non-trade issues such as cyber-espionage.
But, as the WSJ cautions, "it is far from clear whether the discussions will produce any agreement."
Furthermore, it isn’t clear what specifics the U.S. is asking for or what Beijing is willing to entertain. One offer, according to Chinese officials: in return for the suspension of U.S. tariffs, Beijing would agree to lift restrictions on China’s purchases of U.S. farm and energy products.
Such a deal would follow the model of partial agreements the U.S. has cut in recent months with the European Union and Japan, U.S. officials said. In those deals, the U.S. agreed not to levy more tariffs—in those cases, tariffs on automobiles—while the two sides negotiated over specific areas. With Japan, for example, Tokyo agreed that any deal would increase automobile production and jobs in the U.S, while Washington agreed not to press Tokyo for more concessions on agriculture than Japan had previously allowed free-trade partners.
As Nomura's McElligott notes, in the context of the Cohen headlines, Trump may be more eager to getting a favorable, actionable outcome than the "we had a great meeting" or "agreement to work on a framework" conclusion. On the other hand, some have noted that a tariff pause means little for yuan currency control as the PBOC is already doing that with yuan at 7.00.
Furthermore, there has been "chatter" that the meeting went from a 90 min 1-on-1 and was "downgraded" to a 60 min working dinner.
Still, the algo kneejerk reaction was prompt, and after hitting session lows earlier on the Navarro news, the S&P has since rebounded and has cut its losses in half... at least until the next negative headline or FOMC minutes.