Yves here. As long-standing readers know, we’ve never exhibited much interest in economic forecasts since even macroeconomists admit they are horrifically unreliable once you get beyond 6 months. Forecasts seemed particularly uninteresting in the post crisis era when a lot of people were trying to paint happy faces on what was eventually declared to be secular stagnation. The much more interesting stories were things like how if evah would the Fed back out of ZIRP, the continuing rise of inequality and how US health care costs were eating the economy. But now we have had many interventions related to Covid, as well as a lot of dropped balls. And we’re going to see in due course how this plays out when we get to a recovery. This article is admittedly one forecast of how 2021 might play out.
Yves Smith considers the following as important: Australia, commodities, currencies, Economic fundamentals, federal reserve, Guest Post, Macroeconomic policy, Pandemic, politics
This could be interesting, too:
Lambert Strether writes 2:00PM Water Cooler 4/20/2021
Yves Smith writes The Shock and Reality of Catching Covid After Being Vaccinated
Yves here. As long-standing readers know, we’ve never exhibited much interest in economic forecasts since even macroeconomists admit they are horrifically unreliable once you get beyond 6 months. Forecasts seemed particularly uninteresting in the post crisis era when a lot of people were trying to paint happy faces on what was eventually declared to be secular stagnation. The much more interesting stories were things like how if evah would the Fed back out of ZIRP, the continuing rise of inequality and how US health care costs were eating the economy. But now we have had many interventions related to Covid, as well as a lot of dropped balls. And we’re going to see in due course how this plays out when we get to a recovery.
This article is admittedly one forecast of how 2021 might play out. Most Wall Street economists assume Covid will be largely behind us by late 2021. If the new variants don’t get the better of the vaccines, and the vaccines confer more than 6-8 months of immunity, that could prove to be spot on.
The new hot button worry among the optimists is inflation. They may be correct but I don’t think they are articulating the reasons very well.
The reason we are seeing a K shaped recovery is the loss of a lot of low level jobs. Some of that is business closures (not not necessarily reflected in bankruptcies but mere shuttering of operations) and many of those aren’t coming back soon. Think of stores in central business districts, and swathes of the travel and hospitality industries. I’m not sure that capacity gets added back quickly and smoothly. This forecast does directly point to supply constraints as having the potential to curb an expansion but doesn’t unpack that
Another issue is oil. Higher gas prices serve as a dampener. If oil stays over $60 a barrel, those charges will hit consumer budgets and percolate though the economy. Lumber and copper prices have spiked, anticipating the costs of repairs of water damage all across Texas. Recall that the inflationary effects of the Texas power outages are coincident factors that don’t help the recovery story.
However, what I don’t see mentioned here is how the downdraft from dealing with past due residential and business rents will affect the economy. For instance, in NYC, 90% of restaurants can’t pay the rent they owe. How many of their landlords are prepared to give them a break? And what about tenants? Many experts expect a wave of evictions when the various moratoriums expire. Some may be able to cobble together a new arrangement. Some may have to live with relatives, which could force them to look for new jobs. Some will wind up homeless. And for the landlords that evict, how long before they find new renters?
By David Llewellyn-Smith, Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super, the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and previously, the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. Originally published at MacroBusiness
In a normal business cycle recovery, the economy gradually returns to full employment, causing a lagged return of inflation pressure. This gives monetary and fiscal authorities’ time to recalibrate policy before there is serious overheating. This cycle looks far from normal:
Super easy monetary and fiscal policy suggests the fastest business cycle recovery since the 1950s.
The recovery could be so hot, it starts to bump up against supply constraints before reaching full employment.
By late next year, policy-makers could face some very tough choices as they try to decide whether to pull back or not.
Two accelerators and no brakes? Never in history has the US had such a big, coordinated double dose of super-easy monetary and fiscal policy. Despite the drop in the unemployment rate from a peak of 14.3% to 6.3% the Fed shows no sign of withdrawing stimulus. Not to be outdone, the Biden Administration is proposing: a repeat of the 13% of GDP stimulus from last spring and an even bigger infrastructure plan to follow. Add to that another 14% of GDP in excess bank deposits from last year’s stimulus and the economy is primed for surging spending as it reopens. Michelle Meyer and team are forecasting 6.5% GDP growth this year and 5% next year compared to trend growth of less than 2%.
While inflation has been very sticky in recent years, we can’t rule out an early rise. A simple supply and demand framework illustrates the challenge (Exhibit of the day). The“aggregate demand curve” slopes down to the right—the lower prices are the more people will want to spend. Fiscal and monetary stimulus tend to shift the aggregate demand curve to the right. Meanwhile the“aggregate supply curve” slopes up—higher prices encourage firms to supply more goods and services. Moreover, it is common to assume that the supply curve gets increasingly steep as spare capacity shrinks and the economy approaches potential output and full employment.
The concern is that the US could hit the upward sloping part of the AS curve very quickly. If demand surges and businesses bring back capacity slowly there could be pockets of inflation. These short-run supply-side constraints are particularly relevant if a number of small businesses have closed for good. Many economists point to a temporary spike in year-over-year inflation in March and April as prices surge relative to depressed prices last spring. However, there could be a second surge due to a supply constrained reopening in late spring-early summer.
Looking further ahead, given the speed of the recovery, it could prove hard for policymakers to hit the brakes in a timely manner. The Fed is seeking an undefined overshoot of the inflation target and hence will wait until the last minute to hit the brakes. Meanwhile there is strong momentum towards additional fiscal stimulus, including a big infrastructure plan. With unified government, infrastructure spending should be relatively easy to pass since projects can be directed to reluctant Senators.
Our hope and expectation is that after years of low and sticky inflation, the increase will come slowly, buying time for a policy turn. But, we worry about a boom this year and next followed by a bust in 2023, as policy makers hit the brakes later, but harder. After all, once inflation starts to trend higher, it can only be stopped with at least some rise inthe unemployment rate. One of the rather depressing historical regularities is that the unemployment rate has never risen by more than 0.5% without a recession following. For now, however, let’s enjoy the ride.
My view is that US inflation will remain stronger than elsewhere but not overheated because China is hitting the brakes, commodities will tumble, dragging down CNY and EUR, driving up the USD.