by Marc Chandler
My articles My offerMy siteAbout meMy videosMy books
Follow on:LinkedINTwitterSeeking AlphaAmazon
I am on vacation, and then on a business trip that will interrupt the commentary until the weekly note on April 30. The May monthly analysis will be published the following week after the FOMC meeting and April employment report. I wanted to weigh in on a few key market issues before leaving.
New Divergence: The continued robust US jobs growth (276k average in Q1 24 and 251k average in 2023) and above-trend growth allow the Federal Reserve to remain focused on inflation. And for good reason: CPI has consistently been reported this year above expectations. The headline rate stands at six-month highs. Fed Chair Powell has drawn attention to the core services excluding housing, and it rose at around an 8% annualized pace in Q1. For all practical purposes, the Eurozone and UK are nearly stagnant, and price pressures are moderating quicker than in the US. The widening two-year premiums capture this divergence. The US pays around 200 bp more than Germany to borrow for two years. Last year's peak was about 205 bp. The US pays nearly 60 bp more than the UK for two-year money. That is the most in a year. One is paid to be long dollars. The next targets may be near $1.06 for the euro and $1.2400-50 for sterling.
Japanese Yen: The threat of intervention helped cap the dollar near JPY152 last year and in recent weeks. However, the US CPI proved too much and the dam burst. Stop-loss and option-related buying lifted the dollar beyond JPY153. Resistance, or where economists might talk about supply, is difficult to assess given that these levels have not been seen in 34 years. We have talked about JPY155. The high in 1990 was slightly above JPY160. We argue that Japanese officials made a tactical mistake by not intervening in the thin markets around Easter. That could have knocked the dollar down before what had been expected to be a solid US jobs report and a sticky CPI. We also argued that the likelihood of Japanese intervention during the first state visit in nine years was slim. Intervention to knock down the dollar, which ostensibly is important in the efforts to restrain prices, would be a diplomatic insult. Japanese officials stress the pace of the move rather than a particular level. One-month implied volatility is near 9%. When the BOJ intervened in Sept-Oct 2022, it was around 14%-17%. Three-month implied volatility is also near 9%. During the last bout of intervention, it was 13%-14%. Actual, or historical volatility over the past month is around 6%. It was around twice as high around the time of the 2022 intervention.
Chinese Yuan: If Chinese officials stopped managing the yuan, it would likely fall sharply. It is off almost 2% this year. Among the other major currencies, it is virtually tied with sterling as the best performer. The point is that Beijing is resisting the pressure from a strong dollar. It is not seeking export advantage through the exchange rate. Before the recent holiday, another way that the approved band can be defended was illustrated. Without resorting to overt or covert intervention, trades on the electronic platform that would imply a price outside of the band were blocked. China has the resources to mount a more serious defense of the yuan, but why should it? It is a story about a strong US dollar. The resilience of the yuan has meant that it has strengthened against many of China's trading partners. The tolerance, though, has limits. We suspect the dollar can move back into its previous range CNY7.25-CNY7.30.
Surplus Capacity: Two ways have emerged to deal with the surplus generated by modern economies. The traditional way is China's path. The surplus capital is used to expand productive capacities. The surplus capital is transformed into excess capacity, surplus production, and exports. After Europe and Japan rebuilt after WWII, a crisis emerged in part driven by the surplus savings and falling rates of profit. As capital became more abundant, it began running into the rigidities of the institutional constructs of fixed exchange rates, limited capital mobility, and (relatively) strong unions. Capital went on the offensive. Floating exchange rates were introduced. Capital was unshackled, mobility began in earnest, and financial innovation was encouraged. Unions were purposefully weakened; wages were de-indexed and decoupled from inflation and productivity.
A new strategy to absorb surplus capital emerged as a solution to the crisis of the 1960s and 1970s. It entailed an enhanced role for the US as the banker of the world. The US would absorb the world's surplus production and savings. Since the early 1980s, the US has been recording a current account deficit. It has been buying more goods and services from the world than it sells, broadly understood. US stocks and bonds attract the world's private and public savings. They are the deepest and most liquid capital markets in the world. The latest figures show foreign investors own about 25% of US Treasuries, 15% US equities, 25% of corporate bonds, and 17% of Agency bonds. Combined, foreign investors' holdings of paper and real assets are worth about $54 trillion.
The US has created an enormous financial superstructure that can absorb the surplus capital, siphon it away from redundant investment and surplus production. The shift from defined-benefit pensions to defined-contribution plans force-fed an equity culture. The new strategy also required the rationalization of production, which means that many industries are oligopolies and not competitive in the classic understanding. Another cost of the financial superstructure strategy is that it appears to extenuate the divergence of wealth and income.
China's adoption of the traditional strategy on a huge scale is causing trade tensions. The US innovation poses its own risks. The price of capital was to absorb the shocks so that the real economy could be more stable, but what we have experienced is serial financial crises. Surely, the end of the US property bubble in 2008-2009 had a greater global impact than the collapse of China's property bubble. To be sure, the US generates a surplus, despite having a current account deficit. Consider, for example, since 2020, US corporations have bought back around $5 trillion of their own shares, something that was illegal, and regarded as unethical, until the early 1980s, to cite but one illustration. The political scientist, Frederick Thayer (Rebuilding America: A Case for Regulation and End to Hierarchy, an End to Competition) deduced excess production from the logic of market economies and competition.
You Might Also Like
Week Ahead: Enthusiasm for the Dollar Rekindled
2024-03-23
Last
week will be remembered for several things. First, the Bank of Japan lifted its
interest rate target for the first time in 17 years and formally ended its
Yield Curve Control and ceased buying ETFs. The yen sold off and the dollar
approach the 2022 and 2023 cap slightly below JPY152. Japanese officials have
used the language that has signaled heightened risk of intervention in the
past. Second, the Swiss National Bank became the first G10 central bank to cut
rates. Its low inflation and soft growth impulses provided a conducive
backdrop, and there may be some tactical advantage in cutting before others to
minimize the risk of the franc strengthening. Third, the PBOC relented and
allowed the dollar to rise above the CNY7.20 cap that has held it back this
year. The near-term risk may
Week Ahead: With the Markets Converging (Again) with Fed’s Dots, Is the Interest Rate Adjustment Over?
2024-02-24
The US dollar and interest rates appear to be at an inflection point. Much of the past several weeks have been about correcting the overshoot that took place in Q4 23, when the derivatives markets were pricing in nearly seven quarter-point rate cuts by the Federal Reserve this year.
Week Ahead: Markets Digest New Economic Divergence after US Employment Report
2024-02-03
The US employment data blew away expectations, jumping by 353k,
nearly twice the median forecasts. That, coupled with the 0.6% rise in average
hourly earnings, which was also twice expectations, helped drive home the
Federal Reserve’s reluctance to endorse what had been market speculation of a
March rate cut and an aggressive rate cutting sequence. The dollar had softened
as US rates eased following the FOMC meeting and new strains among regional
banks (and some foreign banks with exposure to the US property market), but the
jobs data turned things around. US rates rose sharply, and the greenback
rebounded. US regional bank shares stabilized.
The week ahead
is bound to be quieter. The economic highlight is the final January PMI, which
is rarely a market mover. The Reserve Bank of
February 2023 Monthly
2024-01-27
The coming weeks will
likely continue the correction of the trends that began last month. The markets
recognize that tightening cycle is over. However, they swung hard, pricing in
aggressive easing by most of the G10 central banks, including the Federal
Reserve and the European Central Bank. Official comments and some
high-frequency economic data have encouraged participants to rein in their
expectations, reducing the odds of a rate cuts in Q1 and paring back the extent
of the cuts this year. The pendulum of market expectations reached an extreme. In
the first part of January, pricing of the Fed funds futures strip implied a
rate cut at each of the remaining seven FOMC meetings. While this is possible,
it is not the most likely scenario, especially given what we know about the
national
Week Ahead: Real Economy
2024-01-13
Given the world’s turmoil, including the escalation, and
broadening of the conflict in the Middle East and China’s continued aerial
harassment of Taiwan ahead of the election, the capital and commodity markets
have remained firm. February WTI fell about 1.7% last week and March Brent
slipped around 0.65%. Shipping costs are rising as the Rea Sea is avoided
and supply chain disruptions are threatened. Still the MSCI index of developed
equity market rose by nearly 1.8% last week after posting snapping a nine-week
advance the previous week. The MSCI emerging market equity index is off about
3% to start the year. China alone accounts for about half of the losses. Neither the
slightly firmer than expected US December CPI, that included a 0.4% rise in the
core measure excluding housing, which
January 2024 Monthly
2023-12-30
The
only thing that can be said with high confidence about the year ahead is that it
will be different from 2023. Three broad forces will shape the business and
investment climate in the year ahead.First, the post-Covid
tightening cycle in the high-income countries, leaving aside Japan, has ended.
The question is when and how fast rate cuts will be delivered. Moderating price
pressures and weaker growth impulses have seen the pendulum of market sentiment
swing dramatically from the "higher for longer" mantra of most of
last year to pricing in aggressive easing the Federal Reserve and European
Central Bank. Several central banks from emerging markets, especially in Latam
and central Europe, have already begun cutting rates.The Federal Reserve’s
balance sheet shrank to a little less than
Short Note for the Day after Thanksgiving
2023-11-24
Price Action:
Since the North American markets closed Wednesday, the foreign
exchange market has been subdued. Most of the major currencies are
+/- 0.2%. The Antipodeans and sterling have risen a bit more.
The euro is in the middle of this week’s range (~$1.0850-$1.0965).
The dollar is at the upper end of this week’s range against the Japanese
yen (~JPY147.15-JPY149.75). Sterling is trading near the high for
the week set in Europe today near $1.2565. Recall that the $1.2590
area is the (50%) retracement of the losses since the March high
(~$1.3140). The Australian dollar is firm but holding below the week’s
high (~$0.6590) and the 200-day moving average (~$0.6585). The US
dollar settled on Wednesday slightly above CAD1.3685.
November 2023 Monthly
2023-10-28
November may be an in-between month. It will be a month of
limited monetary policy actions and a period of heightened geopolitical
tensions. Fiscal policy may be more interesting, with a Japanese supplemental
budget, more measures expected from China, and a debate in Europe over the
re-implementation of the Stability and Growth Agreement. In the US, the drama that played out in the House of Representatives could still leave the federal
government with insufficient spending authority. In light of recent geopolitical developments, Ray Dalio of
Bridgewater was quoted suggesting that the odds of a world war were near 50%.
Others simply recognize that the risks are the greatest in decades. And yet,
the capital markets have been amazingly orderly. To be sure, there was some
dramatic price
Tags: Featured,macro,newsletter,Surplus Capital
