Wednesday , September 30 2020
Home / Charles Hugh Smith / Inflation Is Stealth Austerity

Inflation Is Stealth Austerity

Summary:
Rather than decry austerity, which demands an open political discussion of trade-offs, we should decry inflation's stealthy reduction of purchasing power. Austerity--bad. Inflation--good. Oh wait--they're the same thing: both are a reduction in purchasing power. The only difference is a reduction via austerity is upfront while inflation is a stealth reduction, obfuscated by "official" distortions and Federal Reserve mumbo-jumbo. Consider ,200 in wages, unemployment, stimulus, Social Security payment, etc. If this payment gets cut by 10%--0--as a result of austerity, pay cut, reduction in hours worked, etc., recipients scream bloody murder. But if inflation reduces the purchasing power of the ,200 by 10%, nobody does anything but grumble that "prices keep rising while my

Topics:
Charles Hugh Smith considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Tyler Durden writes American West Dominates Ranking Of Cities That Saw Fastest Growth Over Last Decade

Tyler Durden writes UNC Grad Students Demand Administrators’ Salaries Be “Redistributed”

Tyler Durden writes China’s Too-Big-To-Fail Real Estate Giant Averts Liquidity Crisis

Tyler Durden writes The Fed Has Given Big Business A Huge Advantage

Rather than decry austerity, which demands an open political discussion of trade-offs, we should decry inflation's stealthy reduction of purchasing power.
Austerity--bad. Inflation--good. Oh wait--they're the same thing: both are a reduction in purchasing power. The only difference is a reduction via austerity is upfront while inflation is a stealth reduction, obfuscated by "official" distortions and Federal Reserve mumbo-jumbo.
Consider $1,200 in wages, unemployment, stimulus, Social Security payment, etc. If this payment gets cut by 10%--$120--as a result of austerity, pay cut, reduction in hours worked, etc., recipients scream bloody murder.
But if inflation reduces the purchasing power of the $1,200 by 10%, nobody does anything but grumble that "prices keep rising while my income stays the same." This is the classic boiled frog syndrome: inflation is like the heat being turned up so gradually that the poor frog doesn't realize he's about to expire.
Inflation is stealthy because the loss of purchasing power is difficult to monitor. Your $1,200 only buys what $1,080 bought in the recent past; 10% inflation reduced your income exactly the same as if austerity had subtracted the $120 upfront.
Governments and central banks love inflation because the theft goes unnoticed. The public tolerates inflation because it's easy to passively accept this erosion in their standard of living and difficult to generate the political heat that an outright cut would spark.
Though it's being openly engineered by the Federal Reserve, inflation appears to be a force nobody controls--unlike austerity which is so clearly a political decision. If Inflation robbed 10% of everyone's income overnight, people might be roused from their passivity to protest.
But since the theft occurs slowly--what's 1% a month?--and unevenly across a spectrum of goods and services, this theft doesn't rouse the same political storm as upfront austerity.
Inflation is a form of sacrifice that few recognize as sacrifice. It seems like everyone's income is eroded equally, but this isn't true: the wealthy closest to the Fed's money spigots are earning multiples of inflation from asset inflation, stock buybacks, etc. Inflation is a pinprick to the wealthy and a stilletto in the kidneys of the bottom 95%.
To the political Aristocracy, inflation is wonderful because they don't need to ask anyone to sacrifice 10% of their income as they do with austerity; they just steal the 10% a dribble at a time and throw up their hands as if inflation is some mystery force completely beyond their control.
Ironically, austerity--an honest, upfront political decision and sacrifice--is decried, while the dishonest, stealth cut of inflation is passively accepted, even as the Federal Reserve has made a cloaked political decision to reduce the purchasing power of everyone's income except for the New Nobility (the top 0.1%) that the Fed slavishly serves.
Rather than decry austerity, which demands an open political discussion of trade-offs, we should decry inflation's stealthy reduction of purchasing power, a Fed policy that benefits the few at the expense of the many.
Here is the Chapwood Index of inflation, which carefully measures "apples to apples" costs of essential goods and services in each city:
Inflation Is Stealth Austerity
As inflation erodes purchasing power, workers' share of the economy has declined dramatically-- a double-whammy of declining purchasing power and standard of living.
Inflation Is Stealth Austerity
Recent Podcasts:

NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.
Thank you, Darren B. ($200), for your beyond-outrageously generous contribution to this site -- I am greatly honored by your steadfast support and readership.
 
Thank you, James A. ($50), for your monumentally generous contribution to this site -- I am greatly honored by your steadfast support and readership.
Charles Hugh Smith
At readers' request, I've prepared a biography. I am not confident this is the right length or has the desired information; the whole project veers uncomfortably close to PR. On the other hand, who wants to read a boring bio? I am reminded of the "Peanuts" comic character Lucy, who once issued this terse biographical summary: "A man was born, he lived, he died." All undoubtedly true, but somewhat lacking in narrative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *