Thursday , March 21 2019
Home / CEPR Blog / Labor Market Policy Research Reports, December 2018

Labor Market Policy Research Reports, December 2018

Summary:
CEPR regularly publishes a curated collection of original research from academic institutions and nonprofits on the state of the US labor market. The compilation is part of our ongoing effort to promote informed debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. The Brookings Institution How to Adjust to Automation Automation ...

Topics:
CEPR Blog considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

CEPR Blog writes RDP Requests Record of Contracts between BlackRock and Key Federal Agencies

CEPR Blog writes Good Medicine: Universal Paid Sick Leave

CEPR Blog writes Coalition Asks Pelosi: Make Ways & Means Committee Do Its Job

CEPR Blog writes Speaker Pelosi: We Urgently Need Energetic House Ways & Means Committee Oversight

CEPR regularly publishes a curated collection of original research from academic institutions and nonprofits on the state of the US labor market. The compilation is part of our ongoing effort to promote informed debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives.

The Brookings Institution

How to Adjust to Automation

Automation is likely to exacerbate existing deficiencies in the government approach to worker development and training. Current policies tend to target young people at the beginning of their working lives, leaving many older workers unable to upgrade their skills in the face of shifting labor market demands. The author calls for substantial reorientation in approaches to (and subsidization of) training throughout workers’ lives and points to the disruptive potential of automation and the likelihood of future recession as reasons for urgency.

Who Makes the Rules in the New Gilded Age?

The author makes a robust comparison between the digital information age of today and the Gilded Age that took place a few decades after the Civil War. Both then and now, the rules governing new technology were made by an elite few for their own benefit, resulting in societal instability and inequality. The comparison yields several takeaways for the reassertion of the public interest and the preservation of democracy.

Read More ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *